Transactions & connectionssenior🔒 Pro concept

Why sequences leave gaps: caching, WAL log-ahead, and rollback

Simple terms

A sequence promises two things: unique, and increasing. It never promised no gaps. The jump from 1 to 101 happened because a session grabbed a block of a hundred values up front and threw away what it didn't use. The crash skipped a run because Postgres pre-logs a batch of values to WAL and treats anything unspent as gone. And the rolled-back insert still burned its number, because sequences deliberately sit outside your transaction. Making them gap-free would mean every insert queuing behind the last one.

You might be asked

Our primary-key sequence has gaps -- it jumps from 1 to 101, and after a crash it skipped ~30 values, and a rolled-back transaction still 'used up' an id. The customer thinks we're losing data. Walk me through why a PostgreSQL sequence is allowed to have gaps and where each kind of gap actually comes from.

TopicWhy sequences leave gaps: per-session CACHE, the SEQ_LOG_VALS=32 WAL log-ahead, and nextval being non-transactional
PostgreSQL17.10 (SEQ_LOG_VALS=32, the per-session cache, and non-transactional nextval are unchanged on 12-17)
Tools usedpgi17 lab (PostgreSQL 17.10), nextval + reading the sequence relation (last_value, log_cnt, is_called), source @REL_17_10 src/backend/commands/sequence.c
Last reviewed2026-06-19

Pro concept

Full answer and evidence depth sit behind Pro

You have the question and a plain-English lead. Pro unlocks the short answer, what the docs say, what the code does, the labeled lab evidence or reproduction protocol, how to use it under pressure, and the references.

ProFull answer + evidence depth

Unlock the full breakdown for Why sequences leave gaps: caching, WAL log-ahead, and rollback

You have the interview question and a plain-English lead. Pro opens the short answer, the manual walkthrough, the source decode, and a 17-line evidence section that states whether it is raw output, a captured run summary, or a protocol to run yourself, plus how to use it under pressure.
  • How you'd answer it, the full senior-level short answer
  • What the docs say, the manual's actual wording, with the citations
  • What the code does, the mechanism decoded from PostgreSQL's own source at a pinned tag
  • Proof from a real run, labeled as raw output, a captured run summary, or a run-it-yourself protocol
  • Using it under pressure, the situation, the call you'd make, what goes wrong, and what people get wrong
  • Version notes, what changed across PostgreSQL releases

Card required. Cancel before day 7 and you are not charged.

Compare plans

How this was verified

The open teaser is the question and a plain-English lead. The short answer, the manual walkthrough, the source decode, the lab evidence, and how to use it under pressure unlock with Pro. Evidence is labeled as raw output, a captured run summary, or a run-it-yourself protocol.

Connected

Where this concept connects

How this concept links across the library, the interview questions that test it, its plain-English glossary definition, and the guided pathways it belongs to. Open the full map to explore further.

Open in the interactive map →